Monday, April 21, 2025 - Insurance companies all across are starting to review how they cover fire departments still using outdated firefighting foam including per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Widely employed for decades to fight fuel-based flames, these foams are under increasing environmental and health risks today. Insurers are considering the legal and financial risks of underwriting departments that have not yet switched to PFAS-free alternatives as PFAS have been connected to major diseases including cancer. Comprising these compounds, Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) has come under increasing legal pressure as more firemen and locals file PFAS cancer lawsuit claims, asserting exposure via training exercises, emergency response, or contaminated settings. The ubiquitous presence of PFAS in drinking water close to airports, fire stations, and training facilities where historical foam has been applied worries insurance carriers especially. Targeting foam producers and municipalities, lawsuits are growing and insurers are now deciding whether ongoing use of these materials could expose them to ever-rising legal expenses and long-term responsibility. While some rules are rewriting to completely exclude claims connected to PFAS, others are mandating departments demonstrate they are no longer utilizing outdated foam. These developments coincide with resources already under pressure for fire departments, thus using alternate suppression chemicals could call for more money than easily accessible.
The changing insurance policy also puts pressure on agencies to examine their firefighting supplies, particularly foam stockpiles bought years ago, more closely. Departments that keep storing or using legacy AFFF run not just legal danger but also loss of liability or pollution coverage, which may have a major impact on operations should a contamination claim arise. Some fire departments find themselves stuck between growing demands to eradicate drugs now judged to be ecologically dangerous and directives to deploy effective fire suppression tools. Concerned about the long-term effects of PFAS exposure, insurance companies are advocating more openness about foam use, storage, and disposal. Sometimes insurance renewals are postponed or rejected outright until departments can show adherence to new safety criteria. These changes mirror the larger financial consequences of PFAS-related litigation, which has already caused private businesses and local governments to rethink their chemical policies. Insurers are trying to reduce their exposure to future litigation, particularly those involving groundwater contamination or occupational health claims, as more data surfaces connecting PFAS to public health hazards. Fire departments know more and more that depending too much on outdated foams can leave them vulnerable to expensive legal action. Some have started internal assessments, teamed with environmental consultants, or looked for government financing to move away from materials derived from PFAS. Although some states have already outlawed the use of legacy foams, numerous agencies all throughout the nation are still adjusting to balancing operational needs with changing financial and legal reality. The reaction of the insurance sector gives the PFAS debate fresh urgency since it indicates that the effects of inactivity could go much beyond environmental and health hazards. Should fire departments fail to react rapidly, they could find themselves without vital insurance cover as legal demands grow. One thing is becoming clear as insurers, municipalities, and fire departments negotiate the consequences of PFAS use: depending too much on legacy foam could compromise not only the health and the environment but also the financial stability of the very departments assigned to safeguard public safety.
Our attorneys specialize in holding large corporations accountable when they've placed profits ahead of safety. Through settlements and winning verdicts, our attorneys have obtained millions for our clients. Let us help you today.
Filing a lawsuit will allow you to hold the federal government accountable for damage it has caused you or a loved one, while also providing real compensation for your medical expenses, suffering and loss. Contact us today for a free consultation.